Date: 10/28/11
Name: Bar Peretz 702
Title:Will Steve Jobs final vendetta haut google?
Author: Michael Liedtke
Source: Miami herald
The topic of the article is: stealing
The main idea of the article is (implied /stated): The main idea of the article is that one of steve jobs creation which was the iphone has been stolen by google and changed it to android.
The author’s purpose for writing this article is to
The author’s perspective in this article is objective/subjective (biased) because this article is unbiased and it talks about how Steve Job was angry when his I phone was stolen, but it also states that when he was young one of his products, was based on technology by others.
The pattern of organization of the article is cause and effect because it's organizing that Google stole the Iphone idea,and the effect was Steve was doing an attack on Google.
The reason the author chose this pattern for the article is that the author might want to let the reader know how the chain of events in the last few years.
The text features included in the article are: The subtitle under the title, this helps by letting the reader know the overall question of the story, an illustration helps by giving the reader a picture of Steve Jobs and one of his products, and the source in which this article was published helps by letting the reader know where there might be more information on this topic.
This article is about (a summary in your own words) how when Google stole one of Steve Job's idea, he was so angry that he was going to do anything for them to give it back and the money they gained from the product, then he gave an attack to Google and some of his followers made protests.
The significance (importance) of this article is so people know that some products from Google, like the Android, are actually stolen from Apple.
What I learned from this article is to always look on the internet about the product and see if the company made it or not or maybe to see the original company and buy it from there.
What I liked about this article was that it gave unbiased information and I was able to get more information.
What I did not like about it was that Google stole a product from Apple changed the name and said it was theirs.
Who should read this article and why I think people who bought the Android should read this article, so they understand what's really going on.
This article reminds me of (text-to-self) how sometimes people steal your stuff or maybe projects or homework and say it's theirs so they get the credit for doing nothing.
(text-to-text) I don't know any other books with this topic.
(text-to-world) I would relate this to real life because there are companies who sometimes steal other companies' ideas and make them their own.
New vocabulary I learned
Word Context Clues Meaning
1. Antipathy 1. I inferred the meaning 1.a contrariety in feeling
2.Theft 2. I looked in the words near it 2.an instinctive of stealing
3.Retaliated 3.I reread it as many times 3. to return like for like
No comments:
Post a Comment